Adrian Miroiu’s Weblog

MTAP

Semestrul I, anul univ. 2008-9

Analiza normativa. Dreptatea distributiva dupa Rawls

Cursul urmăreşte să analizeze câteva dintre cercetările asupra dreptăţii distributive ulterioare apariţiei teoriei rawlsiene. Au fost alese cateva teme, care să deschidă perspective semnificative asupra înţelegerii dreptăţii.

Un al doilea obiectiv important al cursului este aela de a evidenţia diversitatea tipurilor de abordări asupra dreptăţii, a perspectivelor teoretice (şi chiar disciplinare) la care se face apel.

 

 

Temele 1 – 3. Teoria dreptatii a lui Rawls

 

J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice, paragrafele 1 – 30.

J. Rawls, Political Liberalism, cap. 1, 2, 4, 6.

(În româneşte, despre Rawls se poate folosi antologia A. Miroiu (ed.), Teorii ale dreptăţii, Alternative, Bucureşti, 1996.)

 

 Temele 4 – 5. Abordari marxiste ale dreptatii

1.

J. Elster, Making Sense of Marx, cap. 4

Wood, A., The Marxian Critique of Justice, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1, 3, 1972, pp. 244 – 282

2.

R. Miller, Rawls and Marxism, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1974, pp. 167 – 191

Clark, B., Gintis, H., Rawlsian Justice and Economic Systems, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 7, 4, 1978, pp. 302 – 325

Allen E. Buchanan,  Marx, Morality, and History: An Assessment of Recent Analytical Work on Marx, Ethics, Vol. 98, No. 1 (Oct., 1987), pp. 104-136

 

 

Temele 6 – 7. Dreptate si egalitate

1.

Dworkin, R.,  Sovereign Virtue. The Theory and Practice of Equality, Harvard University Press, 2000. (What is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare, Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 10, No. 3. (Summer, 1981), pp. 185-246; What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources, Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 10, No. 4. (Autumn, 1981), pp. 283-345.)

Scanlon, T. M. Jr., Equality of Resources and Equality of Welfare: A Forced Marriage?, Ethics, Vol. 97, No. 1. (Oct., 1986), pp. 111-118;

Facultativ: Cohen, G. A., On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice, Ethics, Vol. 99, No. 4. (Jul., 1989), pp. 906-944; Anderson, E.S., What is the Point of Equality?, Ethics, Vol. 109, No. 2. (Jan., 1999), pp. 287-337.

2.

A. Sen, Inequality re-examined, cap. 1 – 9.

 

Temele 8 – 9. Rawls si Walzer

1.

Walzer, Spheres of Justice

2.

Walzer, Philosophy and Democracy, Political Theory, 9, 3, 1981, pp. 379 – 399

Walzer, Thinking Politically, cap. 5, 6, 10

 

 

Tema 10. Critici feministe ale lui Rawls

Okin, S.M., Ratiune si sentiment in intelegerea dreptatii, in A. miroiu (ed.), Teorii ale dreptatii, Alternative, 1996.

J. Sterba, Justice for here aned now, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1998, cap. 4

Okin, S.M., The Family: Gender and Justice 

Temele 11. Neutralitate si avantaj

 

D. Gauthier, Morality and Advantage, The Philosophical Review, 76, 1967, pp. 460 – 475

D. Gauthier, Dreptatea ca alegere sociala, in A. Miroiu (ed.) Teorii ale dreptatii.

B. Barry, A Treatise on Social Justice, vol 1, Harvester, London, 1989, cap. 1 – 3.

 

 

Tema 12. Abordari pozitive ale dreptatii

J. Konow, Which Is the Fairest One of All? A Positive Analysis of Justice Theories, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 41, 4 (2003), pp. 1188-1239.

Philip A. Michelbach, John T. Scott, Richard E. Matland, Brian H. Bornstein, Doing Rawls Justice: An Experimental Study of Income Distribution Norms, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 47, No. 3 (Jul., 2003), pp. 523-539

Skyrms, B., Evolution of the social contract, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996, cap.

Binmore, K., Natural justice, Oxford University Press, New York, 2005

Bibliografia este minimală; studenţilor li se vor solicita şi alte lecturi relevante.

 

Cerinţe:

 

• Participarea activă la seminar – 25%
• Prezentarea a două position paper în cadrul seminarului – 25%
• Realizarea unei recenzii a unei cărţi pe tema discutată – 25%
• Examen final – 25%